To cut down Delhi's air pollution, pinpoint the sourceThis winter, Delhi's government and the judiciary have implemented several policies aimed at cutting Delhi's air pollution.The just-concluded odd-even scheme in the city required motorists to find alternative means of transportation every other day.Car-free days,
This winter, Delhi's government and the judiciary have implemented several policies aimed at cutting Delhi's air pollution.
The just-concluded odd-even scheme in the city required motorists to find alternative means of transportation every other day.
Car-free days, first in Gurgaon and then in Delhi, appeared to cause a temporary dip in pollution levels.
The night hours when trucks can pass through Delhi have been reduced, and the National Green Tribunal has issued a direction to lower truck traffic coming into the city at night by levying an additional entrance fee.
On some days the air may be clearer. But what remains hazy is where Delhi's air pollution comes from.
Over the years, multiple attempts to find out called source apportionment studies have yielded contradictory results.
There are numerous suspects: cars and trucks, smokestacks, farm fires in Punjab and Haryana, and dust from construction sites to name just a few.
Without a better knowledge of the portion contributed by different sources, any policy response, no matter how bold, will be a little like a blind attempt to pin the tail on the donkey.
But that may be changing. The Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur has now released a major study, commissioned by the Delhi environment department in 2011.
This promises to give the clearest picture of source apportionment yet. And other new sources of quality information on air pollution are appearing: the government has plans to add 10 new air quality monitoring stations in Delhi, and news outlets are setting up their own monitoring systems, including IndiaSpend #Breathe.
This could be a turning point in our understanding of the sources of Delhi's deadly air, as well as our ability to craft smart policies that shut them down.
We at Evidence for Policy Design (EPoD) are researchers who assist government ministries in formulating such responses.
We think that at a time like this a critical convergence of public concern, policymaker attention, and academic contribution it's worth taking stock of what we know now and how we came to know it.
That clarity will make it easier to guide the discussion toward a policy response that will stick.
Search out the source
There are two ways of conducting source apportionment studies: direct sampling based on chemical analysis, and secondary data analysis based on monitoring data.
International best practice is to rely on receptor-based studies, but where budgetary constraints inhibit adequate sampling, analysis using secondary data may dominate.
Over the past 10 years and excluding the just completed IIT Kanpur Study, we count 15 source apportionment studies that sought to pinpoint the sources of emissions and their respective contributions to Delhi's overall air pollution.
Ten are based on direct sampling; the other five rely on secondary data. While the main sources identified are similar across studies, the relative weights placed on different sources by these studies vary dramatically. This underscores both the difficulty of conducting them and the wide range in quality of the studies currently available.
Getting a reliable picture of air pollution is inherently difficult due to Delhi's changing weather conditions and constantly shifting patterns of emissions throughout the day, week, and year. Moreover, some of the most important pollution sources lie outside the National Capital Region.
This makes it important that direct air sampling studies are broad enough to capture multiple sources and take samples at several different time points.
An inability to do this largely due to budgetary considerations and the resulting differences in what gets sampled are an important part of the explanation for the large differences across studies.
In such situations, secondary data-based analysis may well be the best option for source apportionment studies, as long as these secondary sources are reliable and span relevant emission sources.
Right now, we lack a measure of whether that is the case. Without standardised best practices about which secondary data sources to use and which model to use, source apportionment studies will continue to give conflicting results going forward.
So we not only lack the best information on pollution, we also lack consensus on how to determine the second best.
In tomorrow's continuation of this article, we will describe how findings from the new IIT Kanpur study fit into that data hierarchy, and the other information systems needed to create a policy response that will clear Delhi's deadly air.
How To Pinpoint Delhi's Air-pollution Sources
Delhi is at a crossroads in its approach to air pollution. Since the capital topped the World Health Organization's list of most-polluted cities, the public has focused its attention on the issue and the government has responded with ever-stronger measures.
Now the Indian Institute of Technology (IIT) Kanpur has released a long-awaited study that attempts to identify the sources of air pollution and inform the next wave of policies.
We at Evidence for Policy Design (EPoD) are engaged with government ministries in formulating and testing those policies.
Yesterday, we described existing source apportionment studies research that attempts to identify where Delhi's air pollution comes from, be it exhaust from vehicles, smoke from fires, or dust from construction sites.
These studies have had widely divergent results, in part because we lack a consensus on how to weigh different types of evidence. Comprehensive guidelines for source apportionment studies in India do not exist.
The new IIT-Kanpur study improves on previous attempts by taking seasonal variation in pollution into account, showing that vehicles are a much bigger contributor to air pollution in the winter than in the summer.
The study also documents a broad range of sources like garbage burning, dust, and crop burning to paint a more complete picture of what's causing air pollution in Delhi.
This study marks a good time for India's regulators to implement a plan to commission these types of studies at regular intervals, using a regular set of metrics to track how pollution changes as the government intensifies its response.
Fine-grained data for a smart response
Source apportionment studies, even when done well, are not enough. They need to be complemented by a network of air quality monitors that offer a picture of air pollution in real-time, allowing citizens to protect themselves during periods of high pollution and helping policymakers target the most polluted areas of the city.
The backbone of Delhi's air quality monitoring network is its set of 21 ambient air monitoring stations, 11 of which have data that are accessible to the public.
The city's main air pollution concern is PM2.5, suspended particles small enough to be trapped in the lungs.
PM2.5 has been shown to cause lung cancer, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases, asthma, and a host of other health problems.
Data obtained from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) website for the 11 monitors run by the CPCB and Delhi Pollution Control Committee (DPCC) show that PM2.5 was being recorded only 29% of the time at these sites last winter the season associated with the most severe levels of particulate pollution.
Coverage since March 2015 has increased to 46%, but these gaps in the data make it difficult to reliably characterise the actual air quality situation in the city. Continuing the trend of improvement in coverage should be a high priority.
Coverage patterns show that monitor downtime tends to be concentrated in long stretches, when PM2.5 is not being collected for several months.
This could be due to maintenance issues that are not detected or acted upon in a timely manner, pointing to problems with information flows and management within the organisations running the monitors.
Paradoxically, these large gaps in data collection may be easier for the CPCB and DPCC to address than if monitors went down more frequently and for shorter periods.
Making air pollution monitoring data easier for the public to access would be a good step toward creating the accountability that could help these organisations keep the city's monitors functioning.
For the quality of air to improve, the quality of information must first rise. With even a rough idea of source apportionment, the government can take actions like shutting down dirty power plants and pushing neighbouring states to better regulate crop-burning.
Once the low-hanging fruit is picked, policymakers will need increasingly detailed information on location, source, and type of air pollution to design a smart policy response.
Now is the time to get the information systems in place that will inform the next decade of environmental policy in the city, and beyond.
(Indiaspend.org is a data-driven, public-interest journalism non-profit).