EC To Discuss Statute Amendment On Removal
The full Election Commission will meet shortly to discuss the issue of amending the Constitution to see that the CEC does not have such a power against the backdrop of the unprecedented controversy over the removal of an Election Commissioner.
Chief Election Commissioner Navin Chawla, against whom his predecessor N Gopalaswami made a recommendation for his removal last year, says that the CEC does not have such a power and the Constitution should reflect that position.
As the Commission celebrates the Diamond Jubilee on Monday, he feels that a multi-member Commission is "ideal" on several grounds.
"I don't believe that I have the power. I have the power only of consensus. We are a three-member Commission. Only for administrative reasons, there is a CEC. Otherwise our powers are completely equal," he told PTI in an interview.
Asked what has been the government's reaction to his view on the issue, Chawla, who will demit office in July after more than a year as CEC, said he has still not written to the government.
"I propose to consider that (writing to the government) after the Diamond Jubilee celebrations. I have not written yet. We have to discuss it in the Commission," he said. Chawla ssumed the office after the first phase of Lok Sabha polls last year after government rejected his predecessor's recommendation for his removal on the alleged ground of "partisanship".
The CEC had earlier said he will write to the government making his recommendation for the Constitutional amendment.
To a question whether he was going to consult the other Commissioners on the issue since the Constitution vested such a power only in the CEC, Chawla said "I never do anything without consultation with others. That is why I say we are a three member Commission. The Full Commission takes a view on everything."
Asked if he was ready to sacrifice the power of the CEC to recommend removal of an EC, Chawla said "you have to read the Constitution with the letter and spirit of the Seshan order of the Supreme Court. I must abide by that. I do not think myself of 'I'."
Replying to questions on whether the Commission should be single member or multi-member, he said "I think a three-member Commission is ideal. The reason is by definition if any institution is a single member then that person takes with him or her their experinces when they retire."
With three members, he said, even if one person retire, two others remain. That would lead to moving the lessons of the past and good practices of the present and future from one Commission to another, he said adding "so there is continuity. There is great strength in my view." PTI