Ford Assembly election results 2017
  • Akamai
  • CP Plus

Every Fee Paid To My Father Is Accounted For: Prashant Bhushan

New Delhi, Apr 21: Prashant Bhushan, member of the joint drafting panel on the Lokpal Bill, on Wednesday said every fee that his father and co-chair of the panel Shanti Bhushan got for providing professional
every fee paid to my father is accounted for...
PTI April 21, 2011 11:17 IST

New Delhi, Apr 21: Prashant Bhushan, member of the joint drafting panel on the Lokpal Bill, on Wednesday said every fee that his father and co-chair of the panel Shanti Bhushan got for providing professional services as a lawyer was accounted for and tax paid on it, reports The Hindu.

He was reacting to the charge of the former Samajwadi Party leader, Amar Singh, that the SP had paid a fee of Rs. 50 lakh to Mr. Shanti Bhushan for his two appearances before the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court in the Bahujan Samaj Party anti-defection case.

“Did Shanti Bhushan show the Rs. 50 lakh in his Income Tax return of 2006? If he has, it is very good, But if he hasn't, then it is black money that we want to fight against,” Mr. Singh said at a press conference here.

Asked about the charge, Mr. Prashant Bhushan said: “My father has made a clear rule that whatever fee he is paid is deposited in the bank and receipt is issued. The money is fully accounted for and tax paid on it. If he is paid partly in cash, a receipt is given to the payee and the money is deposited in the bank and income tax is paid on it.”

Maintaining that Mr. Shanti Bhushan had never met Mr. Singh, Mr. Prashant Bhushan said that as far as his father, who is 85 years old, could recall he had never been with Mr. Amar Singh on a chartered plane.

“Mr. Singh consulted him on his Rajya Sabha seat matter but then he had sent a lawyer for advice, and passed on the phone to my father to talk to Mr. Singh on the other end.”

Mr. Singh alleged that he got a chartered plane in which  Shanti Bhushan travelled to Lucknow in the anti-defection case registered on February 28, 2006 in writ petition 5058 (MB).

“He was initially paid a fee of Rs.30 lakh for two appearances in Lucknow. He said his fee was Rs. 25 lakh a day, so Virendra Bhatia, the then Advocate-General, paid him another Rs. 20 lakhs in cash in Delhi.''

According to him, Mr. Shanti Bhushan was part of the 80 advocates hired by the SP to defend its case in the High Court.

On Mr. Amar Singh's question how the Bhushans could have got verified the CD against Mr. Shanti Bhushan in a United States forensic lab within three days' of its appearance, Mr. Prashant Bhushan said it was a digital MP3 file which was sent by email.

The Bhushans charged Mr. Amar Singh with being involved in the fabrication of the CD and filed a contempt application against him in the Supreme Court.

Singh further charged the father-son duo with filing PIL petitions frequently. “One files a PIL petition, then the other helps the person against the PIL,” he said.

To this, Prashant Bhushan said his father had never appeared against him in any case. “My father takes commercial cases but he has appeared alongside me in cases like the Narmada dam, Bhopal gas and Bofors.”

Referring to Anna Hazare's appreciation of rural development work in Gujarat and Bihar, Singh said there was a feeling amongst people that the BJP was behind the crusade of the civil society.

On him playing into the hands of the Congress, he said, “Yes I was with [Congress general secretary] Digvijay Singh and [Minister for Water Resources and member of joint panel on Lokpal Bill] Salman Khurshid at the opening of a school in Farokhabad by a member of my fraternity. Mr. Salman happens to be the local MP and  Digvijay Singh is in charge of Uttar Pradesh Congress.”

 

You May Like

   
 

More from india

 
 
 
  • Gujarat

  • Himachal