Mark Zuckerberg defends internet.org; says platform not against 'net neutrality'New York: Finding itself at the receiving end of the 'net neutrality' debate, Facebook today said its Internet.org platform has benefitted "millions" of people on RCOM network in India and it is open for all
New York: Finding itself at the receiving end of the 'net neutrality' debate, Facebook today said its Internet.org platform has benefitted "millions" of people on RCOM network in India and it is open for all mobile operators.
Asserting that universal connectivity and net neutrality "can and must" co-exist, Facebook Founder & CEO Mark Zuckerberg also said that he strongly disagrees with the criticism that Internet.org offering some services for free goes against the spirit of net neutrality.
He also said that internet.org will never create 'fast lanes' for a select few by throttling the other services.
Zuckerberg's comments, made on his Facebook post, come in the midst of a public uproar in India, especially on social media platforms, that platforms like internet.org and Airtel Zero violate the principle of net neutrality.
Net neutrality calls for equal treatment to all Internet traffic with no priority given to an entity or company based on payment to service providers like telecom companies, which is seen as discriminatory.
Amid a raging debate, both the platforms have already seen some of their partners walking away, including Flipkart from Airtel Zero and entities like Cleartrip.com, Times Group and NDTV from internet.org.
These services are being billed as going against the concept of maintaining equal Internet access for all, although they claim to allow users to access a variety of mobile and Internet applications for free.
The critics allege that these services restrict the 'free' access to a select group of websites and apps and therefore sabotage the entire concept of keeping the Internet free.
Defending his initiative, Zuckerberg said, "Over the past week in India, there has been a lot written about internet.org and net neutrality" and he wanted to present his position on these issues for everyone to see.