Court admits defamation case against Arvind Kejriwal for his 'thulla' remarkNew Delhi: A trial court on Friday admitted a defamation case filed against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for using derogatory term ‘thulla' for policemen.The court has fixed September 10 for recording of pre-summoning evidence
New Delhi: A trial court on Friday admitted a defamation case filed against Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal for using derogatory term ‘thulla' for policemen.
The court has fixed September 10 for recording of pre-summoning evidence in a criminal defamation complaint by a Delhi Police constable against Kejriwal.
Metropolitan Magistrate Anu Aggarwal, while fixing the next date on the complaint filed by constable Harvinder posted at Govind Puri police station here, summoned the Station House Officer and a head constable as complainant witnesses for recording their statements.
“I have gone through the authorities cited by the counsel for the complainant. Even otherwise in the interest of justice I deem it fit to grant opportunity to the complainant to substantiate the averments made in the complaint by leading appropriate evidence.
“List for the purpose of evidence on September 10, 2015.Witness 2, SHO of Govindpuri police station, with the original complaint and witness 3, Head Constable, be also summoned for the next date of hearing...” the magistrate said.
The court fixed the matter for recording pre-summoning evidence after hearing arguments of the complainant's counsel.
The court had on July 24 sought a clarification from the constable as to how Kejriwal's alleged ‘thulla' remark given during a recent interview has provoked breach of peace.
Advocate L N Rao, who appeared for complainant constable Harvinder, had argued before the court that due to Kejriwal's ‘thulla' remark, the entire Delhi Police was demoralized.
“...Using a derogatory and demeaning term like ‘thulla' to refer to police personnel is equivalent to referring to all Delhi Police officials as lethargic and unproductive. This word has, therefore, harmed the reputation of the complainant in the eyes of general public including his family, relative and friends,” the complaint said.
(With PTI Inputs)