N Srinivasan and Niranjan Shah stalling Lodha reforms: CoA tells Supreme Court

The COA also informed that BCCI is yet to appoint an Ombudsman since September 2016. An Ombudsman is necessary for dealing with cases of Conflict of Interest.
BCCI's Committee of Administrators. - India TV Source: PTI
Edited by: India TV Sports Desk New Delhi 12 Jul 2017, 02:01 PM IST

In a scathing status report, the Committee of Administrators (CoA) has described N Srinivasan and Niranjan Shah as "disqualified office bearers with vested interest", who are trying to stall implementation of Lodha reforms. It is fourth status report that has been submitted to the Supreme Court by the CoA. The earlier reports were filed on February 27, March 17 and April 7. The next hearing on the matter is scheduled for July 14.

The report praised acting Secretary Amitabh Chaudhary for trying to work towards implementation of reforms but accused treasurer Aniruddh Chaudhary - a Srinivasan loyalist - of being a "mute spectator".

The COA also expressed its helplessness in building consensus among State Units.

Point seven in the report read:"During the intervening period of three months since CoA filed third status report, every effort has been made by the CoA to build consensus among constituent members of BCCI for adoption of new BCCI constitution. The CoA held two meetings, on May 6 (a day before SGM) and June 25 (a day before SGM) in an attempt to build consensus but all these efforts were to no avail."

"The SGM held on June 26 was manifestly disruptive.

Before the meeting a substantial consensus has been arrived at as a result of mutual deliberations between COA and various constituents members of BCCI."

Point nine mentioned former BCCI President Srinivasan and Shah, who have been kingpins of disruption.

"The SGM on June 26 was attended by various persons who are disqualified from being office bearers of BCCI and/or their respective state/member associations including N Srinivasan (represented TNCA) and Niranjan Shah (Saurashtra CA) amongst others."

"Such disqualified persons have a vested interest in stalling implementation of judgement because if the judgement is implemented, such disqualified person will have to relinquish control over their respective state associations," stated point 12.

The COA has also submitted an audio file that indicates that during the June 26 meeting, some disqualified members "tried to hijack" the meeting.

The COA also mentioned that state units are trying to find a way to accommodate disqualified people as the SC order only speaks of debarring disqualified office bearers from attending the BCCI meetings.

However, people like Shah without holding any post are taking advantage as there is no definition of status of an ordinary member for attending BCCI SGM.

Shah was a special invitee at the SGM courtesy being a member of the special committee, formed for the implementation of reforms.

The COA also informed that BCCI is yet to appoint an Ombudsman since September 2016. An Ombudsman is necessary for dealing with cases of Conflict of Interest.

(With PTI inputs)

Related Tags: BCCISupreme Court
Read Complete Article
 
 

Write a comment

 

More from sports